More than than 90 percent of kids play video games, and more than 90 percentage of games rated E10+ or above contain violence. What touch on does this accept on young children?

On December 14, 2012, 20-yr-old Adam Lanza shot and killed 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School, including xx children, earlier committing suicide.

In their struggle to empathise why this tragedy occurred, public figures drew attending to the fact that Lanza was an avid video game player. He played video games that glorify violence like "Thou Theft Auto" and "Call of Duty." From there, pundits asked the larger question: are video games making kids violent?

More than than 90 percent of American kids play video games. The number might be as high as 99 per centum of boys and 94 pct of girls. Information technology's not only kids playing, either — co-ordinate to the Entertainment Software Association (ESA), 58 per centum of all Americans play video games, and nearly half of Americans over 50 play. The organization also plant that 45 pct of gamers are women and that the boilerplate gamer is thirty years old.

Gameplay is likewise on the rise — i study shows that average daily video game play amongst kids ages viii to eighteen rose from 26 minutes per day in 1999 to almost 110 minutes (nearly two hours) per day past 2009. The numbers are even higher for boys, 25 percent of whom play video games for four or more hours per day.

And playing video games means playing violent games, it seems. More than xc percent of games rated E10+, Teen, or Mature take some kind of violent imagery, and "that violence is often portrayed as justified, fun, and without negative consequences," write researchers Douglas Gentile and Craig Anderson, of Iowa Land Academy.

Even E-rated video games, which the Entertainment Software Rating Lath (ESRB) says are suitable for all ages and "may contain minimal … violence," are suspect. 1 report institute that 35 of 55 East-rated games involved deliberate violence, and 33 reward violence or crave violence to accelerate in the game. That study as well found that of 32 games that did not have a content description for violence, 14 games independent violence anyhow.

Become the Facts: What Is Aggressive Behavior? »

In the short term, it'south fairly easy to measure the effects of vehement video games: set a group of people down, take them play a violent or nonviolent game, then mensurate the results. A slew of studies have establish that in comparing to nonviolent or prosocial video games, violent games promote feelings of hostility and assailment, desensitize the player to violence, and skew the player's perception of what constitutes violence.

Do these effects last long-term? To detect out, scientists ran longitudinal studies, tracking how children'south video game use changed over time, and with it, measures of assailment. I study tracked more than than 3,000 kids for three years and institute that playing violent video games increased their impulsiveness. In a brutal cycle, college base levels of impulsiveness increased their video game use. A 2d study on the same set of kids also found increases in assailment.

"Nosotros know that violence in general … is associated with mental wellness problems. We also know, given brain research, that our brain sometimes doesn't distinguish between what'south real and what nosotros see on Television." — Susan Tortolero, University of Texas

Another study published this yr tracked 5,000 teenagers for 4 years and plant that playing Mature-rated video games predicted later risky behaviors.

"Play of these Mature-rated, risk glorifying games was associated with subsequent increases in sensation seeking, rebelliousness, hanging out with kids who smoke cigarettes and drink alcohol, thinking kids who drink and smoke are cool, and thinking that one would similar to try drinking and smoking," explained Jay Hull, department chair of psychological and brain sciences at Dartmouth College, in an interview with Healthline. "In turn, changes in these variables were associated with subsequent changes in drinking, smoking, fighting, risky sexual practice, and delinquent behavior."

The effects were much stronger amongst kids who played fierce games with an antisocial protagonist (i.due east. "G Theft Auto Three," "Manhunt") than with a heroic protagonist (i.e. "Spider-Homo ii").

Some other study by Susan Tortolero, director of the Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Enquiry at the University of Texas, examined the link between violent video game play and depression.

"We know that violence in general — whether it's being a victim of violence, or but witnessing violence — is associated with mental health problems," she told Healthline. "We as well know, given encephalon inquiry, that our brain sometimes doesn't distinguish between what'due south existent and what we encounter on Idiot box."

She establish that playing more than 2 hours a day of violent video games is linked much more strongly with low than playing less than two hours a day of irenic video games.

However, other studies didn't find any such negative effect, or they plant that the consequence goes in the opposite direction. 1 study followed 324 elementary school children for a year. It found that children who were aggressive at the starting time of the report were more likely to accept grown to adopt bloody or brutal video games past the end of the study, suggesting that innate aggression can lead to tearing video game apply. Tearing video game playing, on the other paw, didn't predict subsequently aggression. Another report followed 302 kids for one year and found no connection betwixt video game violence and assailment, violent criminal offense, or bullying behaviors.

Criminologist Ray Surette of the University of Central Florida researched the video-game-playing habits of 249 inmates in a county jail. He found that video game playing did not predict who had committed copycat crimes. However, he did find that the degree of immersion in media (regardless of type) did predict copycat crime.

Most video games don't match the degree of violence in titles like "Grand Theft Auto." In fact, many promote prosocial behaviors, such equally cooperation, teamwork, sharing, and empathy. One analysis found that playing first-person shooter games increases visual-spatial skills and that playing strategy or role-playing games boosts artistic problem-solving skills. It also showed that games tin can improve mood, promote relaxation, and decrease stress and feet.

Some other report establish that role-playing games allow people to "attempt on" different personalities, offer a range of freedom of identity never seen earlier in the pre-gaming era. Meanwhile, action-based games like "Dance Dance Revolution" help promote physical activity and practise. Instruction- and health-oriented video games also have their place. For example, one game called "Re-Mission" successfully teaches child cancer patients to adhere to their treatment regimen.

Exercise any of these skills translate into existent-world success? Experts have mixed views.

"The heart of the upshot is that commercial pilots, those we railroad train now to become [drone pilots], have a set of skills that are location- and environs-specific," said Richard Van Eck, a professor of instructional design and technology at the Academy of North Dakota, in an interview with Healthline. "They look out the windows, hear the plane, feel present in the airplane as it moves. Piloting a [drone] is cipher like that; the primary interface is 2d screens. So it turns out that video games may provide improve training for some of those skills than bodily flight training does."

"In the stop, whether trigger-happy or not-trigger-happy, are but fun, thoughtful, new forms of 'fine art' that don't actually have any more impact than books, music, or other forms of art." — Christopher Ferguson, Stetson Academy

However, video games also teach skills that are undesirable in drone pilots, such as the tendency to shoot at anything that moves. "If gaming can instill the addiction patterns needed to fly a [drone], and so it seems to me that the efforts are beneficial," said John Bridewell, a professor of aviation at the University of North Dakota, in an interview with Healthline. "If at that place is a negative transfer of learning, then it is non then skilful. Habit patterns are very difficult to break. Even when one is able to break a habit pattern, in an emergency, people typically resort to the actions get-go learned."

Major Uriah Orland of the United States Air Strength concludes, "What is harder to capture in current simulators are the roles of pilots, which is much more than merely hand-center coordination. They are a mission commander for a complicated combat weapon system, oftentimes requiring the coordination of other platforms and crews. The pilots are analogous with an operational chain to determine the appropriate employment of munitions and are following the appropriate rules of engagement while making the final decisions on releasing munitions. This leadership, coordination, and responsibility is something that video games cannot begin to replicate."

To examine the wealth of data on the psychological effects of video games, Anderson, managing director of the Center for the Study of Violence at Iowa Land, and Christopher Ferguson, of Stetson Academy, accept performed meta-analyses. These studies combine data from a large number of papers to tease out general trends.

According to Anderson's findings, video games boost the body's fight-or-flight response, increase aggressive thoughts and feelings, and decrease prosocial and compassionate behavior. Ferguson, on the other manus, found that the evidence was ambiguous, and attributed the wealth of data on aggression to publication bias, in which studies that find an effect of some kind are more likely to be published than studies that find no event.

There's a craven-and-egg question here — do violent video games cause aggression, or do kids who are predisposed to assailment later in life too play more violent video games? Anderson espouses the Full general Assailment Model, which states that the brusque-term assailment triggered by video game play generalizes into other areas of life. Ferguson's theory is the opposite: he champions the Catalyst Model, in which video game use activates pre-existing tendencies toward aggression caused past biology, personality, and peer and family environment.

Hull worries virtually this latter model, which he dubs the "bad seed" hypothesis. "This proposes that some kids are just born bad and this 'badness' showtime shows up as attraction to playing games of the blazon we examined," he said. "The bad seed hypothesis has to say that not just does the seed grow toward these bad behaviors, merely it does and then in exactly the way we certificate. It has to dismiss whatsoever lab studies that practise find a causal effect of playing these games on behavior (east.g., evidence of increased aggression, stealing, cheating in the lab — all of which have been documented), as niggling and temporary."

There are, yet, other reasons why video games might exist linked to aggression. Andrew Przybylski, a enquiry fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute, plant that it wasn't violence in video games that predicted aggression but rather how frustrating or challenging a game was to consummate. Other research of his also constitute that "games featuring violent stories and content tend to be more highly-seasoned for those who are higher in trait-level aggression," he told Healthline.

Przybylski besides noted that while virtually all children play video games, well-nigh don't go into problem. A recent study of his constitute that kids who played video games for less than an hour a twenty-four hour period had college life satisfaction and better social functioning than kids who didn't play video games at all. Kids who played 1 to 3 hours of games a mean solar day didn't see any changes, and kids who played 3 or more hours a 24-hour interval turned out worse. This suggests that video games are indeed normal for kids, and that the factors that cause kids non to play games may be linked to other problems. The size of the effect, however, was very small, he said.

Although plenty of studies take linked violent video game play to aggression, the real question — whether fierce video games crusade real-globe violence — is even so up in the air.

For starters, the effect size of video games on children's thoughts and behaviors is very, very minor — less than half of ane pct, Ferguson told Healthline. Anderson says this doesn't mean that the effect is insignificant. Instead, video game violence exposure is one of a great many risk factors for real-world violence.

"No one risk factor can be said to be 'the' crusade," Anderson told Healthline. "Risk factors accrue, equally practice protective factors. This is true for farthermost acts of violence (schoolhouse shootings) as well as less extreme acts. Media violence is non the largest risk factor for afterward aggressive or trigger-happy behavior, but it also isn't the smallest. Information technology is the one risk factor that can be greatly influenced past parents or caregivers without bang-up expense."

Meanwhile, Ferguson found that innate aggression, family violence, and male gender were all linked to real-world violence, but non violent video game play. He finds the thought that game violence might promote existent violence "ridiculous." He points out that Adam Lanza'southward favorite game was "Trip the light fantastic Dance Revolution," which is incomparably nonviolent, and that the Virginia Tech shooter didn't play trigger-happy video games at all.

Read More: What is Video Game and Engineering Addiction? »

James Fox and Monica DeLateur, criminologists at Northeastern University, indicate out that mass shootings are non on the rise, and that there is no connection between trigger-happy video game play and mass shootings. Researchers Patrick Markey and Juliana French, of Villanova University, and Charlotte Markey, of Rutgers University, plant that while video game sales are at an best loftier, violent crime is at an all-time low, with noticeable dips in crime later on the release of games like "Grand Theft Auto."

"The reality is that we take probably both exaggerated the negative and positive touch of video games on children," Ferguson said. "This is typical of the 'moral panic' that follows the introduction of new media into society, which can crusade even scholars, at least in the short term, to [make] exaggerated claims. I think all of us can remember media-based moral panics from our own childhoods … from rock music … to comic books in the 1950s, to Harry Potter, to rap music, to Dungeons and Dragons, etc. In the cease, whether violent or not-vehement, they are but fun, thoughtful, new forms of 'art' that don't really have any more impact than books, music or other forms of art."

Who should nosotros believe? Przybylski constitute that people who did not abound upwards with video games and who lack video game experience are most likely to believe that violent video games cause real-world violence. Meanwhile, Brad Bushman, professor of communication and psychology at Ohio Country University, noted that most Americans get their data on video games from the mass media, and that mass media has increasingly denied the furnishings of video games on violence over time.

In 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in Brownish v. Entertainment Merchants Clan that restrictions on selling Mature-rated video games to minors violated free speech, on the basis that "Psychological studies purporting to testify a connection between exposure to fierce video games and harmful effects on children practice not show that such exposure causes minors to act aggressively. Any demonstrated furnishings are both small and indistinguishable from furnishings produced by other media."

One area of agreement is that parents tin can, and should, get involved. "It might non be accurate to call back just of decision-making a child'southward gaming time as a manner to encourage healthy regulation of play," Przybylski said.

Ferguson added, "I would also suggest to parents to be involved in their children's media lives. Just banning everything objectionable I don't recollect will work, but play games with your kids. The all-time thing for parents to look for is whether the kid is seriously neglecting other responsibilities, skipping school, etc. Even heavy playing isn't a psychological problem if the kid is able to get their other responsibilities in line. Every parent has the right to decide what works best for their family."